People across the usa are wearing Face Masks For COVID-19 in an effort to curb transmission of the coronavirus. But there isn’t enough data to know for sure whether such cloth masks will prevent an infected person from spreading the virus to someone else, experts say.
Within the face of evidence that this coronavirus may spread by talking and breathing, on top of coughing or sneezing, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended April 3 that people cover their faces with cloth or fabric when going out in public places.
Cloth may cut down on some large respiratory droplets from a cough or sneeze, but it’s unclear whether it will also catch smaller droplets called aerosols which can be released by just breathing or talking.
Cloth masks, as well as surgical masks, are created to protect others from virus spread by the mask wearer, not the opposite. Those contaminated with the virus that causes COVID-19 can transmit it to others before they start showing symptoms (SN: 3/13/20). When the masks are worn as a general habit, they aim to prevent individuals who are unaware they are sick from unwittingly transmitting the virus to others. Wearing a mask will not be meant to be a replacement for social distancing, handwashing along with other efforts.
Scientists and journalists share a core belief in questioning, observing and verifying to arrive at the facts. Science News reports on crucial research and discovery across science disciplines. We must have your financial support to get it done – every contribution is important.
But there are few studies evaluating the effectiveness of Masks For COVID-19 at preventing respiratory diseases from spreading, researchers through the U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine wrote inside an April 8 letter to the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy.
People who are available claim that fabric masks may capture large respiratory droplets, like those from a cough or perhaps a sneeze. Those made of different types of cloth have a wide-ranging capacity to filter virus-sized particles, having a trade-off between filtration and ability to breathe.
In one study, a mask that used 16 layers of handkerchief fabric managed to filter out 63 percent of 300-nanometer-sized particles. (The coronavirus is between 50 to 200 nanometers in diameter.) But that mask was harder to breathe with in comparison with thick, tight-fitting N95 respirators, often used in hospitals, that can block minuscule particles. Wearing a cloth mask using that many layers would be uncomfortable and may “cause some to pass through out,” they wrote in the letter.
See all our coverage from the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak
Surgical masks are somewhat less mysterious. Those Face Masks For COVID-19 may help reduce transmission of influenza and seasonal coronaviruses that induce common colds from individuals with symptoms, researchers report April 3 by nature Medicine. Researchers quantified the quantity of virus exhaled by participants both with and without having a surgical mask over half an hour.
Those masks significantly reduced the volume of detectable influenza virus in respiratory droplet particles, as well as the quantity of seasonal coronaviruses in aerosols.
No matter how well they work, the success of cloth or surgical masks at protecting others depends upon whether people wear the gear properly – including keeping it in position – and ensuring it doesn’t get too wet. Moisture, such pqcish from breathing, can trap virus in a mask and transform it into a strong supply of contamination once the wearer takes it off.
Even though the evidence for fabric masks is sparse, health officials should still persuade folks to use face masks, other researchers write in an April 9 analysis in the BMJ. Limited protection could still save lives. “As with parachutes for jumping away from aeroplanes, it is actually time for you to act” without waiting around for evidence, the authors say.